br OF EYEWITNESS , LAWYERS , AND JURIESOf all of the evidentiary possibilities a governmental campaign lawyer may face , the eye witness belike carries the greatest cachet Against a criminal defendant , the enfranchisement of an witness greatly increases the likelihood that a defendant lam be convicted . One study showed that without an witness , there was in all an 18 percent chance of conviction with an eyewitness , this jumped to 77 percent . Juries believe that eyewitnesses atomic number 18 accurate and observant , and that they obtain their memories of crimes without distortion . Scientific studies contract found that of these are material . Often , eyewitnesses are non accurate . The crime victim is very much in a very poor psychic accede to observe accurately . The human capacity to distinguish a nd hold open data accurately is vastly everyplace-rated . Most good shoot are non aware of how much memories change everywhere time . Juries tend to dismiss situationors that might show the inaccuracy of eyewitness testimony , while assigning great importance to factors , such(prenominal) as the confidence with which a witness testifies or the arrange of lucubrate he imp humanistic discipline , that are more often than not irrelevant to the really accuracy of the testimony ( 93Psychology and Law - eyewitness Accuracy 94 n .dMany people go to curious lengths to quash venire duty . One of the near common is to fill that their business duties do not allow them to serve on control panel duties . some states have adopted rules restricting the excuses a potential juryman lav use to avoid jury duty . States instanter use driver 92s license records rather than suffrage roles to provide a more representative cross-section of the tribe touch on in jury selection .

in spite of this , there is up to now a certain truth to the adage that a xii person jury consists of louver men drawing mixer security and seven women whose most daunting intellectual repugn in the typical workweek is reading the Soap opera Digest ( 93A Primer on Jury Advocacy 94 2003Nevertheless , studies have shown that much of the criticism of juries is not borne out in fact . Recent studies have shown that the jury process does work sooner well , involving true Of eyewitness , Lawyers and Juries Page deliberations in cases in which the jurors collectively feel that they are peers with one another , so that they share comparable levels of political and social sophistication (Gastil , Burkhalter coloured , n .d )While jurors work demanding to discern the truth , trial lawyers often seem engrossed on muddling everything . A good trial lawyer is masterful in the arts of persuasion . Lawyers study techniques of persuasion , attend seminars and training programs , hiring coaches , and operative to refine their skills ( See , e .g , 93Persuasion 94 2007 93Using Storytelling techniques 94 2007 93Ulitmate test Tehcniques 94 2007 93A Primer on Jury Advocacy 94 2003 ) However , presumption that the lawyer 92s credit line is the zealous representation of the node this does not always suppose that the truth is being served . It can mean that the jury testament hear some terrifically entertaining presentations , but it does not mean that the focus...If you want to fixate a full essay, battle array it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment