Individual and Group Test of Intelligence

Individual vs group scrutiny Individual discussion tests * There ar two major types of intelligence test, those administered to several(prenominal)s and thsoe administered to groups. * The two chief(prenominal) individual intelligence tests are the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Test (see Murphy & group A Davidshofer, 2001, Chap. 13) Wechsler tests, i. e. WISC for children and WAIS for adults (see Murphy & Davidshofer, 2001, Chap. 13) * These are individual intelligence tests which require person-to-person consultation with the child.The tests contract various communicatory and non-verbal subtests which can be have to give an overall IQ, but which as well provide valuable let on subtest scores and measures based on the behavioural responses of the child to the test items. * both(prenominal) of the content of these tests is clearly culture-loaded, hence there is theKaufman Assessment Battery for Children a more(prenominal) recent test which attempts to minimize cultural bias.The test also attempts to separate crystallised and fluid intelligence. Group intelligence tests * Group-administered intelligence tests involve a series of different problems and are generally used in mass testing situations such as the military and schools. * Examples of group tests are Multidimensional Aptitude Battery, The Cognitive Abilities test, Scholastic Assessment Tests * There has been a trend towards the use of multiple choice items.Many of theses tests have separately clock sub-tests. A major distinction made between types of items is verbal and non-verbal. In recent years there has been a trend forward from verbal and mathematical items towards non-verbal represented problems in pictures. * Part of the reason for shifting away from verbal-based tests, in particular, is the issue of culture-loading. Advantages of group tests * can be administered to very wide numbers simultaneously * simplified examiner role scoring typically more objective * large, representat ive samples often used leading to breach established norms Disadvantages of group tests * examiner has less opportunity to establish rapport, generate cooperation, and maintain interest * not readily detected if examinee tired, anxious, unwell * evidence that emotionally disturbed children do better on individual than group tests * examinees responses more restricted normally an individual is tested on all items in a group test and may become boredom over easy items and frustrated or anxious over difficult items * Individual tests typically provide for the examiner to choose items based on the test takers prior responses moving onto quite difficult items or back to easier items. So individual tests offer more flexibility.